The article highlights the link between digitization and political participation in three Middle Eastern countries: Egypt, Kuwait, and Tunisia. The role of the Internet and social media in political engagement is thoroughly discussed from a historical-comparative perspective. Using micro and macro level data, the study analyzes the usage of new online technologies and online political participation.
The findings provide valuable insights for understanding the intricate nature of online political participation and the paradox between digital engagement and traditional political involvement. Despite the expansion of digital media, traditional political interest and participation has decreased. Egypt and Kuwait demonstrate advanced stages of digitization with widespread Internet access, while Tunisia’s progress is varied.
Category: Hard Questions: Society
-
Digitization and Political Participation in the MENA Region: Egypt, Kuwait, and Tunisia
-
OECD Gender Equality in Technology Governance
Director Mackenzie represented the Aula Fellowship and the AI context in conversations at this global conference for equity. We stand together, or we fall.
-
World AI: Women in AI
A collaborative event with Women in AI. We asked conference participants to tell us about their hard questions in AI, and had many fruitful conversations for future collaborations.
-
World AI: Women in AI
We organized with Women in AI for this 2024 World AI group photo on the main stage. Thank you to everyone who participated!
-
AI Governance for the Global Majority: Understanding Opportunities and Challenges
Artificial intelligence (AI) will impact individuals, communities, and institutions worldwide in both unique and universal ways. While public and private sector actors have begun to build the foundations for achieving more secure and trustworthy AI, the voices shaping the AI governance agenda are primarily from the Global North. To govern AI in a way that reflects a global range of contexts, it is imperative to adopt a more inclusive lens in defining its harms and opportunities. Broadly accepted AI governance principles may struggle to translate into practice without a more explicit focus on how priorities and challenges prevalent in the Global Majority intersect with AI.
-
De la gestión de crisis a la crisis de gestión: Responsabilidad y democracias liberales en el estallido de la pandemia de la COVID-19
El estallido de la pandemia de la COVID-19 conmocionó a las sociedades de todo el mundo. En su esfuerzo por adaptar sus respuestas a la crisis a sus propias condiciones de supervivencia, los gobiernos tendieron desde el principio a recurrir a argumentos que limitaban la rendición de cuentas frente a la población. Las democracias liberales no fueron ajenas a esta forma de abordar el problema. En ese contexto, sus dirigentes esgrimieron la metáfora de la guerra para describir su posición como garantes de la supervivencia de la población frente a la nueva amenaza. Atenazados entre la incertidumbre y la necesidad de predecir la naturaleza y la evolución del enemigo invisible, sus respuestas pusieron en entredicho la responsabilidad política, profesional y personal de los dirigentes. En este artículo se ofrece una reflexión sobre el nivel de responsabilidad de los gobiernos de las democracias liberales en la gestión de la pandemia. Durante la crisis, los decisores tendieron a dejarse llevar por las narrativas que les resultaban más beneficiosas para escabullirse de sus responsabilidades, apuntalando así sus necesidades políticas a corto plazo a través del uso de metáforas belicistas, el juego de culpas, la competición con otros países y la dispersión de las fuentes en el proceso de toma de decisiones. Esta realidad supone hoy un llamado a la reflexión a los actores sociales, incluidos los expertos, intelectuales y medios de comunicación, para trascender la retórica predominante en la gestión de la pandemia y la “nueva normalidad” que le siguió, de manera que la dinámica de alteraciones constantes de las reglas del juego y las responsabilidades pueda dar paso, en el futuro, a un escenario con menos arbitrariedad y más rendición de cuentas.
-
The Rainbow Economy Model Leads to Holistic Circular Model
The Rainbow Economy Model is a theoretical framework that proposes a holistic and inclusive approach to economic development. This model emphasizes the importance of diversity, equality, and sustainability in driving economic growth and prosperity. It recognizes that a vibrant and resilient economy is built upon a diverse range of industries, businesses, and individuals, each contributing their unique strengths and perspectives. The Rainbow Economy Model promotes the integration of social, environmental, and economic factors in decision-making processes, aiming to create a balanced and equitable society. This research aims to explore the principles and potential implications of the Rainbow Economy Model, assess its feasibility in different contexts, and identify strategies for its implementation. The research adopts mixed methodology to ascertain the holistic sustainability circular model namely the “The Rainbow Economy Model”. The practical, the social implications are quite evident, and the contribution is the data collected for future research and the Rainbow model of Sustainability.
-
You are either with us, or against us: the small state of Serbia between domestic ambition and external pressures
This article examines the position of Serbia as a small state in the context of external pressures, largely reflecting an ambition to balance the East and the West. While clearly interested in offers and benefits from collaboration with both geostrategic realms, Serbia’s authorities have always left space for possible alternatives—a trend that is expected to serve power preservation or to inform external players to what extent Serbia is keen on balancing and juxtaposing great powers in the region. While analyzing the limited case of the Covid-19 pandemic and the never-ending case of Kosovo, additionally actualized by the Russo-Ukrainian war, the present study suggests that Serbia is at the crossroads between growing ambitions and the real limitations of what its smallness can achieve. The paper concludes that Serbian foreign policy contains all the prerogatives of movement without a goal, a search for strategic partnerships, but without a coherent political vision—an approach that generates suspicion of being labelled as distracted and unreliable.
-
A Global South Perspective on Explainable AI
A context-driven approach is necessary to translate principles like explainability into practice globally. These vignettes illustrate how AI can be made more trustworthy for users in the Global South through more creative, context-rooted approaches to legibility.
-
How Issav Asimov Predicted/Influenced the Present AI Scenario
This paper investigates Isaac Asimov’s impact on modern artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics, focusing on how his visionary narratives and Three Laws of Robotics resonate with current technological practices and ethical debates. Analyzing specific predictions from Asimov’s works that have materialized in today’s AI applications, we draw parallels between his fictional insights and real-world technologies from leading tech firms. The study further considers the social implications of AI, including issues of human displacement and trust. We also discuss the progress and challenges in formulating global ethical standards for AI, reflecting on national and international efforts. The analysis highlights Asimov’s lasting influence and the ongoing importance of ethical deliberation in the AI field.
-
Preconference workshop for International AI Policy Conference at MILA.
Aula Fellows presented a pre-workshop on asking hard questions on AI. Participants practiced identifying key chaarceristics of hard questions and discussing them together. During the conference that followed, several participants stood and asked hard questions, and several presenters were very happy to receive support and feedback on their most pernicious problems. We were able to build on existing collaborations and continue with or bridge-building between all the people and the people in decision-making roles on AI in society.
-
The missing voices at AI conferences
Policymaking should be a society-wide effort, including elected officials, government employees, academics, business leaders, civil society groups and individuals. In theory, each of us should be able to participate.