AI conferences are pivotal spaces for knowledge exchange, collaboration, and shaping the trajectory of research, practice, and education. This paper presents preliminary findings from an analysis of AI conference mission statements, investigating how their stated goals affect who is welcomed into AI conversations. We find that many mission statements reflect assumptions that may unintentionally narrow participation and reinforce disciplinary and institutional silos. This limits engagement from a broad range of contributors—including educators, students, working professionals, and even younger users —who are essential to a thriving AI ecosystem. We advocate for clearer framing that supports democratizing and demystifying AI. By broadening participation and intentionally fostering cross-sector and interdisciplinary connections, AI conferences can help unlock more innovation.
Work in Progress: Exclusive Rhetoric in AI Conference Mission Statements
Written by
in
2/ Hard Questions, 4/ Fellow”s Projects, Animesh Paul, Hard Questions: Economy, Hard Questions: Education, Hard Questions: Inclusion, Leslie Salgado, M.P.S., Lilianny Virguez, Ph.D., Natalie Perez, Ph.D., Peer Herholz, Ph.D., Research Topic: Discourse, Research Topic: Tech & Society (STS), Rubaina Khan, Sreyoshi Bhaduri, Ph.D., Tammy Mackenzie, M.B.A., Type: Research